Explicit consent + alternative
Provide a non-biometric route for users who decline.
GDPR treats biometric identification data as special category data, and the EU AI Act adds prohibitions and high-risk rules. Here's how to deploy responsibly.
Biometric data for unique identification needs an Article 9(2) condition — usually explicit consent — plus an Article 6 lawful basis.
Large-scale or systematic biometric processing generally requires a Data Protection Impact Assessment.
Since February 2025: no untargeted scraping of facial images, no emotion recognition at work or in education (except medical or safety), and strict limits on real-time remote identification in public.
Remote biometric identification is high-risk; pure 1:1 verification is excluded. High-risk obligations phase in from 2026 — check the current timetable, as adjustments have been proposed.
Authorities such as the CNIL (France), the Dutch AP and German state regulators have issued biometric guidance and fines.
Provide a non-biometric route for users who decline.
Document necessity, proportionality and safeguards.
Sign our DPA; it includes SCCs for international transfers.
No emotion recognition at work or school, no untargeted scraping.
Less sensitive data held, smaller breach impact.
Honour withdrawal and retention schedules in code.
A DPA with the transfer terms your market needs.
General information, not legal advice. Last reviewed 2026-09-30. Confirm requirements with qualified counsel.
Start free, or talk to us about DPAs, processing locations and volume pricing.
We use essential storage to run this site and, only with your consent, Google Analytics to understand how it's used. We never use advertising cookies. See our Cookie Policy.